Comments on: Too much flesh and blood? https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2010/12/09/too-much-flesh-and-blood/ Reflections on preaching, communication and story Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:14:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: What do you think of @Natwivity? A few insights from @richardlittleda https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2010/12/09/too-much-flesh-and-blood/#comment-243 Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:14:11 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-243 […] discuss some deeper issues (including theology!).  At the beginning of the weekend, Richard ran a post asking people what they think of the natwivity. Out of 139, 35 answered the poll, which is in fact a great response rate […]

]]> By: A mosaic of the natwivity « Richard Littledale's Preacher's A – Z https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2010/12/09/too-much-flesh-and-blood/#comment-242 Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:01:18 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-242 […] Between them, however, they are creating a picture of extraordinary brightness and vitality.  As a previous poll is revealing -reactions  to the story have been as varied as the participants […]

]]> By: Richard Mann https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2010/12/09/too-much-flesh-and-blood/#comment-241 Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:45:18 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-241 I voted “Oops” becasue this is the predominant theme of my response to the Natwivity through the first week. However, all these questions and alternative views of the Gospel has really got me excited about the whole adventure and how to see Christmas in a new light. If the form let me choose multiple answers I would have added some Ahh and Whee.

]]> By: preachersa2z https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2010/12/09/too-much-flesh-and-blood/#comment-240 Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:54:44 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-240 No need to apologise. No point having a post like this if it doesn’t allow for discussion! Personally I feel that any tendency towards trivialising is outweighed by a recognition of the enormity of the task which God required of the key players. That’s just my opinion though…

Stay in touch

]]> By: Eddie https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2010/12/09/too-much-flesh-and-blood/#comment-239 Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:46:44 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-239 This is a helpful post, but it doesn’t allow for the possibility that the ‘oops’ is caused because there is something fundamentally flawed in the presentation. Personally, I found the low signal to noise ratio, the insistant self promotion and the trivilising of some parts of the story to be simply offensive. It is possible that things have improved, but I stopped following a while ago.

Sorry to sound like disgusted of Tunbridge Wells!

]]>