Comments on: The metric of success https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2011/11/22/the-metric-of-success/ Reflections on preaching, communication and story Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:16:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: preachersa2z https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2011/11/22/the-metric-of-success/#comment-1065 Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:16:00 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=4113#comment-1065 “faithfulness, authenticity and integrity” – definitely sounds like the way to go! Thanks for your comment

]]>
By: Michael Eve https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2011/11/22/the-metric-of-success/#comment-1064 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:55:27 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=4113#comment-1064 The bottom line in this debate has to whether we are being the kind of people we believe God is calling us to be, are we loving God and our neighbour as ourself. “God requires faithfulness, rather then fruitfulness, from us.”

However, we can’t ignore trying to use the best the world has to offer. If God has revealed insights into his creation to sociologists, psychologists, educationists and others then we should use them as we are able.

For example, if “Mike’s Moving Motors” advertises its presence using neon signs, why does the Church display its presence on a noticeboard with pealing paint?

We have a good product, let’s market it well, through faithfulness, authenticity and integrity.

]]>
By: preachersa2z https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2011/11/22/the-metric-of-success/#comment-1063 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:31:47 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=4113#comment-1063 “Success” is not the enemy, I feel -though numerical success is not the whole story either.

Thanks for your comments

]]>
By: RobPS (@RobPS) https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2011/11/22/the-metric-of-success/#comment-1062 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:24:37 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=4113#comment-1062 Hi,

Struggle to work through the logical implications of a shrinking church, if, taken ad extremis, the natural outcome would be church leaders hearing their own voice rebound off empty hall walls. Yes, we live in a output-orientated, performance-based society, where success is largely regarded as commensurate with monetary/materialistic/wealthy status, but Christ can only be regarded as ‘successful’ in consistently pulling large crowds (often into cramped, out-of-the-way places) to hear him speak. I suspect, head bowed under regular reporting, monitoring, key performance indicators and targets, Tim Suttle might be ‘fudging’ the issue. Success, if such a term is deemed appropriate, in such a context, might reflect spiritual growth, in so far as, in my limited understanding, the Christian relies on God/JC/HS to shape a Christ-like character in us, so that the spiritual fruits, most of us so desire, ripen, mature and are increasingly evident to those we encounter on a daily basis in our lives.

]]>
By: Pete Phillips (@pmphillips) https://archive.richardlittledale.co.uk/2011/11/22/the-metric-of-success/#comment-1061 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:03:06 +0000 http://richardlittledale.wordpress.com/?p=4113#comment-1061 Bang on, Richard. Getting the church right leads to sustainable growth and replication. Just look at the biblical models and all the really good stuff out there in the cell church movement. Surely we shouldn’t be priding ourselves on declining numbers – would the best result for the church to go out of business. However I do think we need to speak ecclesialliy rather than in terms of management speak or marketing speak – in other words, what does success mean not in worldly terms but in terms of God’s ways. As such faithfulness sits up there at the top. But then faithfulness cannot mean decline because that would mean we wouldn’t have a church still! Baby.bath.water.!!!

]]>